Lims training: Lims Training Index

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

3 of the 22 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 19 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 2 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 13 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): one row per course per provider: the system it trains on (vendor-specific or generic), delivery (self-paced, live online, in person), duration, whether a certificate is issued, and the fee where the provider publishes one - with the share publishing a fee at all, because most route to an enquiry form.

Across the rows: the price per training day, vendor academies set beside independent trainers and marketplaces, and which systems have no training market at all.

Nobody joins the vendor academies to the independents.

13 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.